«… и печенеги её терзали, и половцы. Со всем справилась Россия. Победим и эту заразу коронавирусную!»

How Twitter makes fun of Putin’s communicative management of the coronavirus crisis

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13173/WS.67.1.091

Schlagworte:

political communication, social media, memes, intertextuality, irony

Abstract

The paper shows how Russian netizens make use of social media in order to criticize political communication, political projects, and the political and economic elite including President Putin. Using the example of a video speech by Putin in which he compares fighting the pandemic with Slavs’ struggles with their medieval foes, the Polovtsians and Pechenegs, a multimodal discourse analysis of tweets referring to this comparison shows how Twitter is turned into a communicative platform for criticism. The critical stance, however, is predominantly conveyed playfully and relies on intertextuality, interdiscursivity and various forms of irony (e.g. based on the dissociative rendition of stylistic or discursive features and quotes). Furthermore, several Internet memes emerge which playfully refer to the historical comparison. In this way, Russian netizens combine the indirectness of irony, and the bisociation of meanings and contexts characterizing these strategies, with the technical affordances of social media, thus allowing for sampling or remixing but also mere enjoyment of multimodal content. In the context of the discourse, these resources are turned into a tool for protest. The analysis thus also contributes to the discussion of social media’s role in the Russian media landscape.

Literaturhinweise

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2010. Multimodal – intertextuell – heteroglossisch: Sprach-Gestalten in „Web 2.0“-Umgebungen. In Deppermann, Arnulf & Linke, Angelika (eds.), Sprache intermedial, 419–445. Berlin.

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. Localizing the global on the participatory web. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), The handbook of language and globalization, 203–231. Chichester (West Sussex).

Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 2005, 1989. Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. Abingdon.

Beumers, Birgit & Etkind, Alexander & Gurova, Olga & Turoma, Sanna (eds.). 2017. Cultural forms of protest in Russia. Abingdon.

Blackmore, Susan J. 2010. Die Macht der Meme oder die Evolution von Kultur und Geist. Heidelberg.

Bülow, Lars & Johann, Michael (eds.). 2019. Politische Internet-Memes – theoretische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde. Berlin.

Dahlgren, Peter. 2011. Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge.

Davison, Patrick. 2012. The language of internet memes. In Mandiberg, Michael (ed.), The social media reader, 120–134. New York.

Dawkins, Richard. 2016. The selfish gene: 40th anniversary edition. New York.

Denisova, Anastasia. 2017a. Democracy, protest and public sphere in Russia after the 2011–2012 anti-government protests: Digital media at stake. Media, Culture & Society 39(7). 976–994.

Denisova, Anastasia. 2017b. Parody microbloggers as chroniclers and commentators on Russian political reality. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 25. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/648419.

Denisova, Anastasia. 2019. Internet memes and society. Abingdon.

Dergacheva, Daria & Tous-Rovirosa, Anna. 2021. Government’s echo: Twitter discussions around news topics in Russian networked authoritarianism. Russian Journal of Communication 13(2). 1–23.

Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2020. The “long list” in oral interactions. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30(3). 303–325.

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam.

Fedor, Julie & Fredheim, Rolf. 2017. “We need more clips about Putin, and lots of them”: Russia’s state-commissioned online visual culture. Nationalities Papers 45(2). 161–181.

Filer, Tanya & Fredheim, Rolf. 2016. Sparking debate? Political deaths and Twitter discourses in Argentina and Russia. Information, Communication & Society 19(11). 1539–1555.

Flikke, Geir. 2017. “Monstrations for mocracy”: Framing absurdity and irony in Russia’s youth mobilization. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 25(3). 305–334.

Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer & Kronrod, Ann & Elnatan, Idit & Shuval, Noa & Zur, Adi. 2004. Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19(2). 115–141.

Grundlingh, Lezandra. 2018. Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics 28(2). 147–168.

Gunitsky, Seva. 2015. Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on Politics 13(1). 42–54.

Gorham, Michael S. & Lunde, Ingunn & Paulsen, Martin (eds.). 2016. Digital Russia: The language, culture and politics of new media communication. London.

Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and a resource. In Psathas, George (ed.), Interaction competence, 63–92. Washington, D.C.

Johann, Michael & Bülow, Lars. 2019. Politische Internet-Meme: Erschließung eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes. In Bülow, Lars & Johann, Michael (eds.), Politische Internet-Memes – theoretische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde, 13–40. Berlin.

Lapp, Edgar. 1997. Linguistik der Ironie. 2nd edn. Tübingen.

Lonkila, Markku & Shpakovskaya, Larisa & Torchinsky, Philip. 2021. Digital activism in Russia: The evolution and forms of online participation in an authoritarian state. In Gritsenko, Daria & Wijermars, Mariëlle & Kopotev, Mikhail (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of digital Russia studies, 135–153. Cham.

Lunde, Ingunn. 2016. Hashtag poetics: Political humour on Russian Twitter. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61(1). 102–118.

MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy 22(2). 32–46.

Marx, Konstanze & Weidacher, Georg. 2019. Internetlinguistik. Tübingen.

Oates, Sarah & Burrett, Tina & Dubrovskaya, Tatiana. 2018. Russia's public foreign policy narratives. Russian Analytical Digest (RAD). https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/311091 (last accessed 4/1/2021).

Osterroth, Andreas. 2015. Das Internet-Meme als Sprache-Bild-Text. Image: Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Bildwissenschaft 22. 26–46.

Osterroth, Andreas. 2019. How to do things with memes? – Internet-Memes als multimodale Sprechakte. In Bülow, Lars & Johann, Michael (eds.), Politische Internet-Memes – theoretische Herausforderungen und empirische Befunde, 41–60. Berlin.

Phillips, Whitney & Milner, Ryan M. 2017. The ambivalent internet: Mischief, oddity, and antagonism online. Cambridge (MA).

Plattner, Marc F. & Diamond, Larry J. 2012. Liberation technology: Social media and the struggle for democracy. Baltimore (MD).

Poell, Thomas & van Dijck, José. 2016. Social media and new protest movements. In Burgess, Jean & Marwick, Alice & Poell, Thomas (eds.), Sage handbook of social media, 546–561. Los Angeles.

Reporters without Borders (eds.). 2019. Taking control? Internet censorship and surveillance in Russia. https://www.reporter-ohne-grenzen.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/News/Downloads/Russiareport_20191128.pdf (last access 1 Apr 2021).

Ross, Andrew S. & Rivers, Damian J. 2017. Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S. presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media 16. 1–11.

Semino, Elena. 2021. “Not soldiers but fire-fighters” – metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication 36(1). 50–58.

Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge (MA).

Soldatov, Andrej A. & Borogan, Irina P. 2015. The red web: The struggle between Russia's digital dictators and the new online revolutionaries. New York.

Stukal, Denis & Sanovich, Sergey & Bonneau, Richard & Tucker, Joshua A. 2017. Detecting bots on Russian political Twitter. Big Data 5(4). 310–324.

Suslov, Mikhail. 2017. Blogging strategies and political tactics in Runet: Introduction to the special issue. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 25(1). 3–6.

Thielemann, Nadine. 2019. From Poland to #SanEscobar: On strategies subverting political discourse on Twitter. In Lutzky, Ursula & Nevala, Minna (eds.), Reference and identity in public discourses, vol. 306, 251–280. Amsterdam.

Thielemann, Nadine. 2020. #РоссияЖжет vs. #JedzJabłka – A comparative analysis of Twitter discourses on economic counter-sanctions in Russia and in Poland. In Scharlaj, Marina (ed.), Language and power in discourses of conflict, 231–250. Berlin.

Wengeler, Martin. 2003. Topos und Diskurs. Berlin.

Wiggins, Bradley E. & Bowers, G. Bret. 2014. Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society 17(11). 1886–1906.

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87(1–2). 53–76.

Yurchak, Alexei. 2013. Everything was forever, until it was no more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton.

Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and social media. London.

Zherebtsov, Mikhail & Goussev, Sergei. 2021. Tweeting Russian politics: Studying online political dynamics. In Gritsenko, Daria & Wijermars, Mariëlle & Kopotev, Mikhail (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of digital Russia studies, 537–567. Cham.

Veröffentlicht

09.02.2022

Zitationsvorschlag

Thielemann, Nadine. 2022. «… i pečenegi eё terzali, i polovcy. So vsem spravilasʹ Rossija. Pobedim i ėtu zarazu koronavirusnuju!»: How Twitter makes fun of Putin’s communicative management of the coronavirus crisis. Die Welt der Slaven: Internationale Halbjahresschrift für Slavistik. Wiesbaden 67(1). 91–120. (DOI: 10.13173/WS.67.1.091.)

Thielemann, Nadine. 2022. «… и печенеги её терзали, и половцы. Со всем справилась Россия. Победим и эту заразу коронавирусную!»: How Twitter makes fun of Putin’s communicative management of the coronavirus crisis. Die Welt der Slaven: Internationale Halbjahresschrift für Slavistik. Wiesbaden 67(1). 91–120. (DOI: 10.13173/WS.67.1.091.)

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Artikel

Kategorien